Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus Up Next

Stimulus is a political tool and nothing else.
Stimulus provides politicians a way to reward
the parties who support their essence and make
their acquisitions more power possible. The cost
to the overall population is staggering.

Thinking is not allowed in economics if one
wants to get paid. Since I am doing this for
nothing, I can think to my hearts content. You
can think also provided your life and income do
not depend upon your not thinking.

Stimulus does have an effect on the economy but it is not the ostensible effect that is the stated
goal of the initiative.

So, does the economy need to be stimulated with monetary policy or fiscal policy now or at any other time? The answer is yes if you are a politician, the actual recipient of the initial money or an average citizen who unwittingly believes anything he is told.

It is understood and acknowledged, even by economists, that any stimulus program must be
completely objective. In order to be objective, an economic decision is completely necessary.
Given that governments can only make political decisions, objectivity is not possible.

How, is it known that stimulus needs to be implemented? That requires a reliable forecast? When
was the last time economists, even the best in the world have made reliable forecasts? This is a
skill economists don’t have.

Any stimulus is added at a time when all are clueless as to what is coming next.
Stimulus is provided regardless. The money is always used by the initial recipients to make as
much money as they possibly can in the shortest period of time. Hence, our current stock market
bubble.

Are you studying economics? Show this to your professor and ask if he agrees. Ask Gerome
Powell if he agrees? Then ask, if either cares to debate me. What I am telling you hear is self
evident,. So, is it possible for anything to be self evident? According to the U.S. constitution the
posture of self-evident is completely viable.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.”

So, here comes the next round of stimulus? Who benefits and who loses?

Visits: 13

Who Will Unite The Country?

Who will unite the country? Certainly, it won’t
be me. Will it be Joe Biden or Donald Trump?
God forbid that any president unites the
country. Should a country be united?
A united country is fine as long as the population unites
itself independently of a leader urging folks to
unite behind him. If citizens are generally of a
similar mind that is fine. When a politician
seeks to unite the population behind him,
ordinary citizens are being ask to fall on a
sword for their country. Follow a national leader and you are following the equivalent of a Judas
goat.

Lets look at some examples of situati0ns where a leader has united a
country.

The first that comes to mind is Venezuela. Hugo Chavez United
Venezuela. How did that turn out? You decide.

When has the United States been united? There was World War II but it was the war itself that United the country. Hitler did in fact Unite Germany. Germany could not have risen had Hitler not United his country.

The United States  was united behind John F.
Kennedy. But, he was assassinated. Perhaps that is because he was uniting the country in ways
powerful people did not appreciate. Kennedy’s agendas were not fully developed when he died.

The Country was united behind Lyndon Johnson following the Kennedy Assignation. Following,
we got the false flagged
Gulf of Tonkin incident and a useless war that took the lives of
millions.

Richard Nixon united the country early on. He completely finished off the gold standard. The
country is now flooded with unearned fiat currency. He accepted a $2,000,000 donation from
Jimmy Hoffa and pardoned him in order to receive it. Then there was Watergate,

The country was united behind Ronald Reagan. Out of Reagan we got the birth of modern
socialism and perpetual tampering with the financial markets. Under this new system we have
stagnate wages from the middle class on down and enormous wealth and income at the top. The
growth of top down socialism is the root cause of the depression the country is in today.

Both Bushes United the country and the result is perpetual wars in the Mid East.

Bill Clinton did not manage to Unite the country and his administration did little if any
permanent harm to the country.

A system designed around democratic principles is not meant to be united or expected to be.
Check the writings of our founding fathers. Democracy works only when different people and
sides vigorously disagree with each other. In that system, the side that wins turns out to have the
best approach.
So, should the country unite behind the next president? You decide.

Visits: 17