Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts

court justices are deemed to be beyond reproach. Are they? Are they genuinely the finest legal minds in the country? Or, are they just the best politicians among jurists in the United States? Genuinely, judges run for legal positions at some time in their career. They must therefore have the same political skills as any other politician. I have described those in a previous article, just a while back.

When I use natural law to make these kinds of assessments without a bit of hard evidence to back me up, it is for a very good reason. Sure we are all better off when we have accurate facts and information in hand.

At the time we have to make important decisions in the present moment, no facts exist. When we have no way to decide what is true, we are put in a position where we have to use our power of reason, in the light of reality, to decide what is most likely to be true. We have no choice but to do so. These kinds of issues are actually life and death matters. By getting it wrong, our lives can be negatively impacted for the rest of our lives and for the lives of many generations that follow. We all hear the phrase “innocent until proven guilty.” That applies in courts of law. To apply the same reasoning to something like the Supreme Court decision with respect to what is actually turning out to be an invasion at our border –  that constitutes sheer  stupidity. Citizens, for the purpose of self preservation must insist that Roberts be investigated. Yes, this needs to be made into an issue.

>When I use natural law to make these kinds of assessments without a bit of hard evidence to back me up, it is for a very good reason. Sure we are all better off when we have accurate facts and information in hand.

At the time we have to make important decisions in the present moment, no facts exist. When we have no way to decide what is true, we are put in a position where we have to use our power of reason, in the nnocent until proven guiltyy, to decide what is most likely to be true. We have no choice but to do so. These kinds of issues are actually life and death matters. By getting it wrong, our lives can be negatively impacted for the rest of our lives and for the lives of many generations that follow. We all hear the phrase “innocent until proven guilty.” That applies in courts of law. To apply the same reasoning to something like the Supreme Court decision with respect to what is actually turning out to be an invasion at our border –  that constitutes sheer  stupidity. Citizens, for the purpose of self preservation must insist that Roberts be investigated. Yes, this needs to be made into an issue.

When thinking that all supreme court justices are automatically angels, I ask you to remember that Lyndon Johnson would have no one but Chief Justice Earl Warren chair the committee that declared that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin of John Kennedy. We all know that new information over the years has changed that assessment.

Following the passage of the Affordable Care Act, John Roberts managed to come up with the most unique ruling in that situation unlike any other in all Supreme Court history. That was unique. I can’t think of one court case, at any level, where a judge has gone out of his way to find a legal argument that the defending counsel did not think of on its own. His ruling imposed the Affordable Care Act upon the nation. The death rate has been rising ever since. Clearly, the Affordable Care Act is clearly a Deep State initiative.

Now, Roberts has voted with the liberal side of the bench in the recent case involving razor wire at the Texas border.

Is there dirt on John Roberts? He has been mentioned in the Jeffery Epstein scandal. Take a look at the photo below. It is routinely deemed by fact checkers to be some French guy look alike. Take a look at it and ask. Who pays the fact checkers? Is it not equally important to question the veracity of fact checkers and demand that they place their evidence and techniques on the table.  If they are so adept at their craft, certainly they would be pleased to share their technique with others as a gift to mankind.

When I use natural law to make these kinds of assessments without a bit of hard evidence to back me up, it is for a very good reason. Sure we are all better off when we have accurate facts and information in hand.

At the time we have to make important decisions in the present moment, no facts exist. When we have no way to decide what is true, we are put in a position where we have to use our power of reason, in the light of reality, to decide what is most likely to be true. We have no choice but to do so. These kinds of issues are actually life and death matters. By getting it wrong, our lives can be negatively impacted for the rest of our lives and for the lives of many generations that follow. We all hear the phrase “innocent until proven guilty.” That applies in courts of law. To apply the same reasoning to something like the Supreme Court decision with respect to what is actually turning out to be an invasion at our border –  that constitutes sheer  stupidity. Citizens, for the purpose of self preservation must insist that Roberts be investigated. Yes, this needs to be made into an issue.

Visits: 207

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom McGuiness
Tom McGuiness
2 months ago

Once again, AMEN Jim! The sad thing is 2/3rds of the public probably doesn’t even know who John Roberts is and are far too lethargic to do anything about it if they did. The tumult and suffering HAS to happen, like you’ve said many times suffering has the salutory effect of making people actually THINK.